[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses

Subject: Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:42:16 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Gunzel
References: <9eairb$rq8$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <3b08df27$1@news.iprimus.com.au> <59ohgtopamhf12pmdlee6lpndshta6uvou@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/03.04.11
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:37440

david@spambait.proctor.net (Dave Proctor) wrote in
<59ohgtopamhf12pmdlee6lpndshta6uvou@4ax.com>: 

>>This has to do with where?
>
>KMB of course. Can't you read subject lines?

Kamberra?

-- 
To email me, just remove ".spam" or else your reply gets directed to the 
bit bucket.

Never engage in an intellectual argument with an idiot.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience -- 
(Unknown)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
  - From: "Jonathan Boles" <jaboles@crossswinds.net>

References:
- [KMB] Schedulised buses
  - From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
- Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
  - From: "Erk" <erk@erkV69.au.com>
- Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
  - From: Dave Proctor <david@sd3.mailbank.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] Will new trams draw too much current?
Prev by thread: Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
Next by thread: Re: [KMB] Schedulised buses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread