[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
To Mister Turdcut (Was one of Mr JP Turcad's rants)
- Subject: To Mister Turdcut (Was one of Mr JP Turcad's rants)
 
- From: Aaron Bhatnagar <aaron@mysurnamegoeshere.co.nz>
 
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:09:17 +1200
 
- Newsgroups: aus.politics,aus.general,aus.religion,aus.media-watch,aus.invest,aus.rail,aus.electronics,nz.politics,ca.politics,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.engr.mining,uk.finance,japan.finance
 
- Organization: Cato Institute (NZ)
 
- References: <9g2gqg$4h4$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net> <3B24D88E.DFD9FDA4@durham.ac.uk> <9g43sa$me2$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net> <aaron-665A7C.16444412062001@news.xtra.co.nz> <9g4lcu$rle$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net>
 
- User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
 
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.politics:71195 aus.general:12321 aus.religion:2268 aus.media-watch:2233 aus.invest:6968 aus.rail:39220 aus.electronics:9249 nz.politics:11600 ca.politics:5082 sci.geo.geology:1664 sci.physics:19319 sci.engr.mining:236 uk.finance:1805 japan.finance:53
 
By the way, I never quite understood from your long winded, self 
righteous and often incomprehensible postings, what is your problem with 
the Australians again?
;-)
AB
In article <9g4lcu$rle$1@fenris.isp.9tel.net>, "~~ jp turcaud ~~" 
<henri.airaud@poglio.com> wrote:
> Bhatnagar or Bat Haggard  !
> 
> Do you have problem with your bat mobile ?
> If not could you please bhat away with your bhat haggard mates ... you
> whizzing in and out with your sick comments gives me the woollies ! If 
> only
> you could be spiritual, it would be more bhatible !!!
> 
> As said before,  I am flabbergasted or more to the point  
> flabhatnagarsted
> by your complete lack of aaronic sense ! You look indeed to me indeed a
> phaaronic type of maaronic aaronic moron ! Now if it makes you spit, 
> please
> be good enough not to spit on your Bhat Haggard mates ... this is 
> extremely
> bhat  I believe, even by any bhat murky standard !
> 
> Bhat the way ... this reply holds for the other bhat replies, which you 
> in
> typical bhat aaronic-attempt
> fashion smeared on my other posts ...
> 
> Bhat, Bhat  !!!